|

Introduction
[3.25.06]
My pal Brian is one lucky bastard!
Not only did he get the rare opportunity to catch coldwave pioneers Chemlab
in a rare one-off performance in San Francisco recently, he got to speak
to the man himself JARED LOUCHE about music, art, family and life in the
machine age.
The concert pictures that accompany this article were also taken by Brian
and his brand-spankin' new digital camera. Suffice it to say, I think
we can look forward to some awesome photography in SCN's future.
My personal memories of Chemlab? Well, I remember buying Burnout At
The Hydrogen Bar based on a review I read in a magazine. This was
obviously before the internet allowed us to "preview" music,
so often times my modus operandi would be to go in blindly and hope for
the best. Needless to say, I was NOT disappointed! Chemlab expertly blended
hard rockin' guitars, abrasive synths and cyberpunk lyrics to create the
genre dubbed "coldwave." Burnout is one of those records
for me that has stood the test of time and still sounds great thirteen
years later.
I was lucky enough to catch Chemlab in concert back when they supported
KMFDM on their Angstfest tour back in the day. I also saw Jared do his
thing with Pigface later on down the road. Since the dissolution and reformation
of the band, a full-blown tour has not materialized as of yet. Hopefully,
with the release of both Oxidizer and the new remix disc Rock
Whore Vs. Dance Floor, we may yet get to witness the first poet of
industrial inflict his unique brand of digital chaos upon the masses.
The
Interview
[Brian
Backlash]: First off, you just released
the remix album Rock Whore Vs. Dance Floor, featuring remixes
from Cyanotic, Die Warzau, 16 Volt and a slew of others. It's quickly
proving to be a favorite among fans and critics alike. How did you come
to the decision that you wanted your work reinterpreted by a number of
different artists, and what do you think personally of the final results?
[Jared Louche]: I picked a broad spectrum of artists
because I didn't want the expected. For me, if I'm going to put together
a remix disc, I don't want a remix disc that's going to sound like Chemlab
remixing itself, or Chemlab-genre bands remixing Chemlab. That to me is
not an interested disc. That is not a disc that I would buy, that's not
something that would stimulate me in any way shape or form. I wanted a
disc that was going to push the parameters of the music, that would push
the parameters of the people making the music so that they would do the
new, the different, the weird, with their own ideas and their own approaches
to technology. I didn't want something where you knew what was coming
up next, where you could just throw it on and sit comfortably, in your
own conceptual intellectual sofa and just veg out. I wanted it to challenge,
I wanted it to ask questions, I wanted it to leave questions unanswered.
And, I really felt like there is a broad selection of people that I am
able to draw from and I'm really lucky, and I felt that I needed to draw
from the ones who would provide me most unequivocally interested mixes.
People who--even if they're working within the same sort of genre...the
16 Volt remix sounds like dub Hellbent, which is great. That's not what
you would expect from 16 Volt, that's what you would expect from Hellbent.
Adam Grossman from Ministry, that's a phenomenally interesting remix,
but it's drone and it sounds like droning My Bloody Valentine. And that's
great. That, makes it a remix disc that I want to listen to. I can't listen
to Chemlab stuff over and over and over again, it just doesn't hold me.
I've heard it so much it isn't interesting to me anymore. It doesn't do
anything for me. This is a disc I can listen to all the time because it's
not my material at the end of the day, I'm listening to other people's
interpretations of my stuff but I'm listening to how they interpret it.
What they do with it, and that makes it fresh for me. Which is great,
because I get to listen to stuff the way fans listen to it, and that's
exactly what I wanted. For it to be something that is fresh and sneak
around behind you and also reveal itself slowly. I didn't want it to be
something where once you listen to it once, great, "I got it all
figured out," and you're halfway through it, and you know what the
other half is going to sound like. That's definitely not the case with
this disc, and so in terms of final result? Great success, great success.
I can listen to this one over and over, it still titillates, and that's
really surprising. Well no, it isn't surprising. All I did, I mean once
again, it's me being a conductor. All I did was pick the most interesting
people for it, the people that I knew would turn in fascination and horror
and delight and self deprecation, and let them do what they do best. Just
stand the fuck out of the way and let them get on with it. So the result,
for me? Fantastic, I love it, I love it. I can and do listen to it all
the time. Which I don't do with any Chemlab stuff, I can't stand that
stuff. It's great to play live, but, eh. It's always funny when I go into
clubs being on tour and the dj sees us like "Yeeeaaah, I'm gonna
play somethin' off of Ten Ton Pressure, because I know that they're
gonna totally be into that." Like oh, God, could you not do that?
I mean really, sweet and thank you so much, but ouch...I don't want to
hear that, that's a busman's holiday. So, I think it's a great disc, I
hope that people enjoy it. But once again, at the end of the day, whether
they enjoy it or not, I enjoy it. That's what continues to make it worthwhile
for me to do. You know--more music, more projects, more collaborations,
more records, more more more. As Ratenburg said, you have to keep exposing
yourself to more and just see what happens, and that's what I like to
do, and I think this is a great example of that. This is a fun disc. And
if you don't like it, fuck it, send me the copy I'll listen to it.
[BB]:
You describe yourself as a conductor or maestro, who orchestrates the
sounds of other musicians to achieve a certain sound or product that you're
working for on any given Chemlab record. How does that process vary from
album to album?
[JL]:
It isn't just the Chemlab records that I do that for, either. It's all
records, because I don't write music. Well, I write it in my head but
I don't program, I don't play the guitar, I don't play the drums (though
I studied drums, many years ago). I'm a conductor because I need to work
with people who are insanely creative in their own right, but who have
the ability to listen to the ideas that I'm talking about, and the things
that I hum and the things that I mumble. The things I sonically scatter
at them and bits of other people's music that I play for them, and are
able to translate that into something that resembles both what I've been
talking about and hearing in my head, but is also snake with a tail in
it's mouth eating itself, absorbs and reflects some of their own talent.
I like to work with people, lots of different people, because that stimulates
me in different ways. I'm never really quite sure what the next record
is. Whatever it's gonna be, be it a Chemlab record, the Aliens records,
the Hellbent stuff, the record I'm doing with Mark Spybey, whatever it
is, is going to be different and it's always in flux, it's always in change.
Chemlab, though it was Dylan and I, and then Servo for a while, we had
other people working with us: William Tucker, Charles Levi--who brought
their own ideas into it--who we absorbed them and bent their ideas around
the frame of what we were doing. And always in flux, always in change.
I always want to do new things because there are always new things to
be done there are always new people to work with. There are always different
ways to approach, essentially, the six...there are six basic stories in
all of story telling, but there are a million different ways to interpret
them and a million different ways to tell each one of them and to approach
each one of them. It's the same with music, and in many ways there are
some just very basic songs that have been interpreted a million different
ways. And I love the idea of working with lots of different people, because
that then inspires me and informs the way that I work, and my practices,
and disciplines and non disciplines. So yes I do: I conduct--both electrically
and as a musician--ther people's talents. To try to bring out the new,
the strange, the unexpected, to push the parameters of their talents,
to push the parameters of my talents, and come up with something that
neither of us could have come up with on our own. And that's what's fascinating
to me, and luckily I have been able to work with people who can translate,
(laughs) all the jagged stuff that comes out of me, and make
it work. I enjoy that, it's music in it's own right, whatever it is that
comes out of me. It's channeling the beast, channeling the demons, but
it's definitely a strange process. The way that I approached Covergirl,
was I wrote down the mood for each song--as pretentious as it sounds--the
film references for each song, the literary references for each song,
the colour references for each song. I broke it down into actual instrumentation,
orchestration, and arrangement, the length of each segment of it...then
sent all these hand written notes off to people. Jim Coleman from Cop
Shoot Cop, who did "In Every Dream Home a Heartache," I just
sent him reams of paper. "Okay, here are all these great ideas, hope
you can come up with something really cool, hope it makes sense to you."
We talked on the phone a little bit, three days later he sent me what's
basically the final version of the song. I put it on, and pretty much
trashed the sofa I was sitting on just jumping all over it and kicking
the pillows and broke a window and was like "Yes! Yes! Yes!"
'Cause it was just exactly right. That's how I want the idea of conducting
to work. You know, it's all I got. "I don't play guitar, what do
you want?"
[BB]:
Last night you played your third show since you resurrected Chemlab. How
are you enjoying working with Gabriel Shaw, Jimmy and Regan in this new
live lineup?
[JL]:
No, I fucking hate them, they're all fired. Pack your shit and get off
the tour bus. Yes, I'm enjoying it immensely. They make it come alive
for me. And, I talk about reanimating the corpse a lot, because that's
what it is in many ways. They're really enthusiastic and that enthusiasm
is critical for me at this stage of the game and I can't work with junkies
anymore and I can't work with cynics. I have enough cynicism thank you
fucking very much, for a whole band. I need people who are going to be
filters to that, who are going to be able to absorb some of that, who
are going to be able to deflect some of that. Gabriel is a little machine.
He's like a clean version of Dylan, and he's a really good programmer,
he's a really sharp guy. He's driven, he's hungry, he works hard, he works
the band hard, he makes sure they rehearse their asses off. And he's passionate
about it. The really fucking bizarre thing is that he's played Chemlab
covers in his old band (laughs) I just don't understand that. That just
makes no sense to me. Why in the world would you want to cover a Chemlab
song? But hey, you know, the guy puts up with me, I'm certainly not going
to hold that against him. So yes, I'm having a great time with them--they
really help make it happen for me. And they got great energy as well.
And so that's cool. Yep, I'm really happy with them.
[BB]:
Recently you'd been working with Mark Spybey (Dead Voices on Air) and
Robin Storey (ex-Zoviet France) on a unique sort of record. A lot of the
material you'd been working on was lost when Mark's house flooded. It's
understood that this project is going to resume or is currently in the
works. What kind of album are you working on, and what side of Jared Louche
will we see this time?
[JL]:
Oh God, who is he going to be this time? The moon looked down and puked;
ah, what a creep I hate that guy! Jesus, that Louche? Fuck me, what a
jerk. It's a really hard record to describe. At its inception, conceptually,
we talked about the idea of sound tracking a collection of my stories
and poetry. We riffed ideas by email and on the phone about that. I went
up to his studio, a couple hours from me up in the Grim North (that's
capital G, capital N). We got right into the studio half an hour after
my arriving; basically walked in started throwing ideas around, he just
started laying down some sounds. I got onto the mic and we bent some of
the sounds around, and I just started talking. The first piece poured
out of us like blood from a deep wound and then it resolved itself. It
very quickly found it's own voice, that is not Mark's sound tracking Jared's
stories. It's Jared and Mark being the vessels for this thing that is
self-generating. It's as if it was already in existence and just needed
us to be the funnel through which it could vent into the world. It takes
some of my stories, but breaks them down into jagged little shards. Sometimes
completely incomprehensible shards. Disturbing music--but sometimes really
pretty music. At times it's almost like early Coil doing Nick Drake covers,
which is...bizarre. And there are moments of really tender beauty and
moments of sort of revulsion and horror and disgust. It's a really, really,
really, really weird record. It's not beat driven at all. It's just this
super cool thing that is its own thing. I'm loathe to describe it to a
certain extent, because in describing it it's going to set up a whole
series of preconceptions that I think are very destructive to people being
able to just approach it and listen to it and take it for what it is as
opposed to "Ooooh, the next Jared Record." It is its own thing;
it just needs to have its own life and stand as its own entity. So fuck
it I'm not telling you anything about it, you'll just have to erase all
of it.
[BB]:
The last couple of shows you played recently were in New York and Boston,
and both of those gigs were played to enthusiastic crowds. How was the
San Francisco experience, comparatively?
[JL]:
Excellent. Yeah, it was fantastic. In many ways, best audience yet. And
that's saying something, because both Boston and New York were really
really pumped and full of energy. But yes, San Francisco had a crazy pit,
just a crazy pit going on. We did the Bruised Sex remix version of "Chemical
Halo" and during the strikes in the pre-atro chorus, the whole house
was singing along, and I'm only singing little segments of the chorus...and
the whole house was singing. That felt really good...that felt really
good. It's a great town to play, it's full of freaks and broken robots
and I like that a lot. Good energy, good energy. Exactly what was needed.
I look forward to coming back; I love playing in San Francisco. But then
I love playing in general, you know. It was over the top. And I trashed
my feather boa. Inexcusable behavior.
[BB]:
You've discussed plans for a second Aliens record in the past. Can we
expect to see that project soon, and do you have any songs or collaborators
in mind?
[JL]:
You can always expect to see it soon, whether or not that has any bearing
with the real world, and sinking up to it--I have no idea. I'd love to
get it together soon. I think I'm gonna work with Gabriel on it, though
there are a handful of people that I want to pull into it. There's a guitarist
friend of mine, Mark Plastic in London, who's got a great guitar sound
and I'm going to use him for sure. A couple other of people as well, some
known some unknown but I really, really, really am hungry to get that
going. But there are a couple of records that with any luck will come
together this year, though it's already March so (laughs)...I
don't know. We'll see. It should be an interesting record. I want it to
have that same sort of organic feel to it that Covergirl has,
and a more almost down-tempo feel to it without being sleep and drowsy.
But I want it to be much more...I don't know, it's hard describe how I
hear it in my head, but it's more soundtracky in a way--although it will
be specific songs. And it won't be covers. There will be a couple of covers
on it--it might even be half covers--but there are couple of songs that
I have in my head that I want to be on there. I'll spend some time working
with Gabriel and developing stuff that seems like it fits into that framework
and then we'll take it from there. But when it's actually going to come
together and lurch into world? I don't know...it's so much harder for
me to get records together now, A) because there are so many different
projects that are coming to fruition, and B) because I have a son. He's
insanely time consuming. It'll come, it's just other things will meet
the event horizon first. The next one being the Spybey record, now that
Rock Whore is actually out, finally. So the next one is Spybey,
and then we'll see what else comes out. Maybe this noise record that I'm
not gonna talk anymore about (sinister laughter).
[BB]:
How has becoming a husband and father enhanced and/or changed the way
you work?
[JL]:
Well, I look both ways before crossing the street. It hasn't changed me
topically a whole lot in terms of the things I'm interested in, in terms
of the things I want to write about...though I have a couple of new song
ideas that seem to be speaking with a completely different voice. I'm
not quite sure what that voice is yet. It makes me organize my time better
and try to be more efficient. That's less to do with being a husband than
it is being a dad. I really love being a dad and I enjoy spending loads
of time with him but I'm completely and utterly subsumed by the music.
And the painting and the photography and all the other stuff that people
don't see. So I really have to prioritize a lot more efficiently than
I ever had to before, and that's the biggest change. Also, surprisingly
though I have less time I'm more driven to do things. I'm more interested
in doing more things. I think he's tripped an understanding in me that
I am the past. I'm not it. I'm a cog, and I'm a line on the map. Though
that line will continue to draw, I feel like I'm...I face my mortality
all the time, looking at him. Because I know that I've created something
that with the littlest bit of luck, I won't see its end. I'll be gone
before he is in the way that is right. It's a humbling feeling. I've only
rarely had that feeling before. Dying, yes, you get that feeling. "Gosh,
this is for real (laughs) I'm gonna die." Standing in front
of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine, which was begun in 1892 up in
my old neighborhood, up in the west side of spanish Harlem up by Columbia
University--and it's not going to be done until 2092. I used to stand
and watch the Italian stone carvers carving the statues around the entrance
way, slowly working from chalk to fine line, and then starting to chip
away. And it doesn't even have a spire. Really gives me a sense of place
and how you're just sort of a line on the map--a line on the chronology
of things--and minute and unimportant and mortal. In a very real and quantifiable
way, but Django makes it real in some frightening ways. But it's good
for me, because I am so egocentric and such a mythomaniac that it's nice
to be brought down to earth every now and again. Made to understand that
I am nothing. It's pretty liberating, as much as it is frightening. I
like being nothing.
[BB]:
When you write stories, spoken word, poetry...do you ever have a specific
topic in mind when you begin, or do you just let it flow?
[JL]: Sometimes yeah, some of the work that I
do is very specifically topically driven. The BBC World Service commissions
me to write poems that are all topic specific. George Bush's undershirt,
the weather, for the 50th Anniversary of the first weather broadcast.
All sorts of different things, and that's really good because it's an
excellent exercise to be able to make yourself write about something specific.
But there are plenty of times when stuff just comes out of me and vents
out of me like I said, like blood from a deep wound. Just where you can
see the wound when it first happens and there's nothing at all except
*vrooosh* and it just comes pouring out. So it's definitely both. Sometimes
it's just channeling and sometimes it is topic specific. I just need time
to be able to do more cause I'm a dad--haven't got any time! And yeah,
I try to write everyday. T.S. Elliot said "the writer who writes,
writes." And a bunch of it is shit, of course, because I'm me, and
whoever you are--whether you're making music or stone sculpture or writing
poetry--a bunch of what you do is going to be rubbish. You just gotta
enjoy the process of hacking it and editing it down to that kernel that
is actually worth keeping and then build from there. Or hack it down and
reduce it to its nothing. Then just decide, well, alright it was all shit
and I gotta throw it away. It's a very liberating process. That's what
I do with my paintings. I'll paint for a year, and then I'll set a bonfire
and just burn them all. Bye, see ya later! Creativity is a muscle. If
I gave a hundred pound sack of rocks right now and told you "lift
it over your head" you'd probably laugh in my face. I don't know,
you might be really buff and you could do it, but I sure as shit couldn't.
But if I gave you a 25 pound sack of rocks and say work out with this
for a little while, no problem. Then a 50 pound sack of rocks, work out
with it, sure. You could do that and work your way up the 100 pound sack
of rocks. You can't turn around to someone and say "write War
and Peace," right off the bat. You have to exercise the muscle,
and that's done by writing every day. Yeah, it's a tricky process but
it's rewarding. As much as it is frustrating.
[BB]:
What was your first experience performing for an audience like, and what
role did you play?
[JL]:
Well that goes way way way back, because I feel like I've always been
on stage. I was on stage with my folks all the time. Making up stories,
performing little skits. Yeah, that's a hard one to answer, you know?
And then I was doing theatre in elementary school and high school. Always
enjoyed doing The Importance of Being Earnest. That's a really
tough one to answer because I've been a performer pretty much my whole
life. Which sometimes makes it hard for me to distinguish between the
performance and the reality...but that also makes life really interesting
at times. So, I don't know how to answer that in any better way than what
I've just given you. It's something that's obviously really, clearly encoded
deeply at the base of my DNA column. It's just who I am. So I guess my
first role? Me.
(continued) ->
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
Check
out Chemlab's Backcatalog... |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
[BB]:
You've
kept pretty busy with Chemlab the last couple of years, are there
any plans in the works for more shows, another Chemlab record, a
full tour, perhaps?
[JL]: More shows, yes. Another Chemlab record?
At some point, though it's not at the top of the agenda list. And
a full blown tour? Yes, though I can't say when because it's a time
issue. It's something I've been talking to a number of different
musicians about, to go out and support them. Or have them support
us, whatever it be. I don't want it to be bands supporting us. I
want to go out the way we used to with Nine Inch Nails or White
Zombie or KMFDM and go and mob on somebody else's audience. Be in
front of a couple of thousand people a night. It's much harder to
do nowadays than it was when we were initially out. So I don't know
how that will work, but it's something that I definitely want to
do. There are lots and lots of places to play. Really pleased to
have done Boston, New York and San Francisco. But there's about
75 more markets in the United States to do, never mind all of Europe
which Chemlab has never done. We sent in a package because we got
nominated for Wave-Gotik Treffen, which would have been great. Maybe
next year. I'd love to go storm all over Germany, and I hunger for
Japan. We'll see what happens. But more one-off shows? Yes, definitely.
And then some shows that will be real one-offs. By that I mean I
want to do a show with Gabriel where we rewrite all the Chemlab
stuff as slowed down tones and drones. And Funeral marches, and
dirges. Do a Chemlab re-plugged show that would be a regular Chemlab
set, but all of the songs just splintered, and fucked, and scrapped
raw and completely reworked. So that they would be marginally recognizable,
but much more dirgy and droning. Just do that as literally as a
one-off. Which I think would be a great thing to do. We'll see,
I have a couple of plans like that as well. Another record? Yes,
but there's all sorts of politics attendant to a Chemlab record--and
I don't mean musicians. There will be another record, I just don't
know where. And in an effort to be judicious, I'll leave that there.
[BB]:
A lot of fans inquire endlessly about how they might see the video
for "Codeine, Glue and You." Is "Codeine..."
a video you might put out on the net, and do you have any interest
in making more videos in the future?
[JL]: Isn't that available through the H-bar? The
only reason that I haven't made that properly available was that
I thought there was still active links to it out in the world. So,
now that you mention it, yes I need to put it up. I've got it, I
don't particularly like it--but then I don't particularly like anything
Chemlab. So that's not a big surprise. That's certainly not a reason
to not make it available. Yes, if you pester me about it, yeah,
I'll get back and get home and sort it out how to get it up there.
Then one of these days I'll go through the insanely unpleasant process
of looking at all of our live videos and deciding which clips and
blips should be steered out into the stream. But it is a tooth-grittingly,
splintering unpleasant process for me to watch us live. Just horrendously,
skin shreddingly nightmarish. I could do on with the adjectives
and descriptions. It's terrible. So what I really need to do is
just delegate the process to somebody else that has that one step
of remove that I just don't. All I can do is see every single bum
note, every misstep, every single mistake. So I need to just give
a box of videos to somebody and say, "go through it, cobble
together a reel that some poor saps might be vaguely interested
in laughing at at some point." I'll look at it once and go
"AGGGHH, shit I hate it!" I wouldn't be able to watch
it all the way through. That's the one thing that has kept me from
putting up clips of us from tours during the 90's. I just can't
watch the stuff. I can't do it. I hate it, I hate it, it just sounds
like rubbish. It really does, just unremitting dreck. There's me
singing out of key, and a drum kit going (makes static noise) BRMM
BRMM BRMM BRMM BRMM. And that's it. I ask you, what is the point?
So, I'm taking votes for offers for people to be delegated to...poor
saps.
[BB]:
You've commented that you'll find things in your work that you wish
you could go back and change at a later date, and you obviously
can't at this point. Out of your collective body of work, what's
the one thing you're most continually pleased with?
[JL]:
The idea of the record that I haven't made yet. Really. Everything
else is trapped in amber. There are songs that I like. Burnout
has accumulative ten minutes on it--bits from this song, bits
from that song--that collected I like. About the same for East
Side. I would say that maybe fifteen on Hardcore Vanilla
and Covergirl. Might be generous for Covergirl.
Like Ansel Adams, he used to say "I take a roll of film and
I'm lucky if I take one photo that I really like." So, I figure
liking a collected ten minutes on any of the things I put out is
pretty damn good. I don't like any of the songs all the way through.
So, it's a tough one. I'm really, really critical of everything
that I do. But I think that's a good thing. At the end of the day
you really need to be because otherwise you're not driven to do
any better. You just rest on your laurels and you're not gonna try
and make something that's more interesting, that incorporates different
things, that pushes the envelope further. And for me, if I'm not
pushing the envelope then there's no point in doing it anymore.
I need to be scaring myself. Trying to find a path thru the unknown.
Cause it's in the unknown that you really begin to discover who
you are and what you're made of and what you're worth. If you take
the same route home every day you don't necessarily discover anything
new. Get lost? You discover loads of things new about the environment
around you and yourself--and your relationship to that environment
around you. I like to get lost. So my favorite, most resonant thing
is the thing that doesn't exist yet.
--FIN |
 |
 |
|